Comparison of Dynamic Routing Protocols: RIP and OSPF
 | International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) |  |
| © - June Issue 2013 by IJCTT Journal | ||
| Volume-4 Issue-6 | ||
| Year of Publication : 2013 | ||
| Authors :Mrs.Lalitha, Sugand Rao Rathod |
Mrs.Lalitha, Sugand Rao Rathod "Comparison of Dynamic Routing Protocols: RIP and OSPF "International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT),V4(6):1530-1533 June Issue 2013 .ISSN 2231-2803.www.ijcttjournal.org. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.
Abstract: - The two main classes of adaptive routing protocols in the internet: distance vector and link state. This paper presents the comparison between distance vector and link state. It also outlines the pros and cons of RIP and OSPF protocols and a performance analysis with some possible enhancement is presented. Network Simulator (NS2) is used to obtain the performance results of the two classes using different metrics such as throughput, packet delay and packet loss. Results of the simulation show that OSPF has a better performance than RIP in terms of average throughput and packet delay in different network sizes, while RIP is better than OSPF in terms of number of packet loss in large networks
References-
[1] J. F. Kurose, K. W. Ross, “Computer Network A Top-Down Approach,” 5th ed. Pearson Education pp. 419-420.
[2] E. Altman, T. Jimenez, “NS Simulator for Beginners,” Univ. de Los Andes Merina (Venezuela) und ESSI Sophia-Antipolis (France), Dec 4, 2003. , [Online]. Available http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Eitan.Altman/COURS-NS/n3.pdf
[3] J. F. Kurose, K. W. Ross, “Computer Network A Top-Down Approach,” 5th ed. Pearson Education pp. 419-420.
[4] E. Altman, T. Jimenez, “NS Simulator for Beginners,” Univ. de Los Andes Merina (Venezuela) und ESSI Sophia-Antipolis (France), Dec 4, 2003. , [Online]. Available http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Eitan.Altman/COURS-NS/n3.pdf
[5] Y. Pan, “Design Routing Protocol Performance Comparison in NS2: AODV comparing to DSR as Example,” [Online]. Available http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~kang/teaching/cs580s.s06/final/on-campus/yinfei-final.pdf
[6] A. Rai, K. Kumar, “Performance Comparison of Link State and Distance Vector Routing Protocols Using NS,” [Online]. Available: http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~gauthier/Courses/NS-2/FichiersAnnexe/files/routing.pdf
[7] S. G. Thorenoor, “Dynamic Routing Protocol Implementation Decision between EIGRP, OSPF and RIP Based on Technical Background Using OPNET Modeler,” 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Communications, pp. 191-195. [Online].Available: http://0-ieeexplore.ieee.org.mylibrary.qu.edu.qa/stamp/stamp.j sp?tp=& arnumber=5474509
[8] A. U. Shankary, C. Alaettinoglu, K. Dussa-Zieger, I. Matta, “Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols under Dynamic and Static File Transfer Connections” [Online]. Available: http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~gauthier/Courses/NS-2/FichiersAnnexe/files/routing.pdf
Keywords —Dynamic Routing Protocols, RIP, OSPF, NS2.