Modeling User Experience with Universities Websites Based on Webometric Ranking User Analysis

  IJCTT-book-cover
 
         
 
© 2020 by IJCTT Journal
Volume-68 Issue-4
Year of Publication : 2020
Authors : Adeline Mukanda, Samwel Mbuguah, Franklin Wabwoba, Aselemo Ikoha
DOI :  10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V68I4P127

How to Cite?

Adeline Mukanda, Samwel Mbuguah, Franklin Wabwoba, Aselemo Ikoha, "Modeling User Experience with Universities Websites Based on Webometric Ranking User Analysis," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 165-174, 2020. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V68I4P127

Abstract
The paper sets posits that Universities are ranked globally based on their web presence. The web crawler accesses the universities websites to collect data on presence, visibility, openness, and excellence. These data is then used to rank the Universities based on set criteria. The paper identifies design issues that may affect website ranking. The paper identifies as a gap lack of user analysis model for university website and recommends a study of the same.

Keywords
Website, Webometric, Ranking, Model, Design attributes, Web presence

Reference
[1] Rajkumar R, Sudhamani M.V (2017) “Crawler, for Image Acquisition from, World Wide Web” International Journal of, Computer & Organization Trends ,( IJCOT ) ,– Volume 7 Issue 1 – Jan to Feb ,2017
[2] Al-Khalifa, H. S. (2004). Online Information Review, 38(2), 166-185.
[3] Bakeri , A., Baka, A., & Leyni, N. (2015). “Webometric Study of World Class Universities Websites”. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 105-115.
[4] Rust, V. D., & Kim, S. (2012). “The Global Competition in Higher Education”. World Studies in Education, 13, 5-20. doi:10.7459/wse/13.1.02
[5] Hazelkorn, E. (2013). “World-Class Universities, or World Class Systems?: Rankings and, Higher Education Policy Choices”. In H. E.,W. P., & M. M., Rankings and, Accountability in Higher Education: Uses ,and Misuses.Paris:UNESCO
[6] Cybermetrics. (2020, February). “New edition: January 2020. Retrieved from Ranking Web of Universities: http://webometrics.info/en/current_edition
[7] Unirank (2020) February Edition. Kenya Universities ranking https://www.4icu.org/ke/www.
[8] Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). “The academic ranking of world universities”. Higher education in Europe. 30(2), 127-136.
[9] Bakeri , A., Baka, A., & Leyni, N. (2015). “Webometric Study of World Class Universities Websites”. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 105-115.
[10] Garett, R., Chiu, J., Zhang, L., & Young, S. D. (2016). “A Literature Review: Website Design and User Engagement”. Online J Commun Media Technol, 6(3), 1–14.
[11] Moustakis, V. S., Litos, C., Dalivigas, A., & Tsironis, L. (2004). “Website Quality Assessment Criteria”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04), (pp. 59-73).
[12] Subi?, N., Kruni?, T., & Gemovi?, B. (2014). Responsive web design – Are we ready for the new age? Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 2(1), 93-103.
[13] ISO. (2010). ISO DIS 9241-210:2010 Ergonomics of human system interaction -Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems(formerly known as 13407). Switzerland: International Standardization Organization (ISO). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standards.html
[14] Narang, B., Trivedi, P., & Dubey, M. K. (2017). “Towards an Understanding of UX (User Experience) and UXD (User Experience Design), an Applicability Based Framework for Ecommerce, Intranets,Mobile & Tablet & Web usability”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(5), 2764-2768.
[15] Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). “The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty”. Information & Management, 43(1), 1–14.
[16] Gualtieri, M., Manning, H., Gilpin, M., Rymer, J. R., D’Silva, D., & Yu, W. (2008). Best Practices In User Experience (UX) Design Design Compelling User Experiences To Wow Your Customers. Forrester Research, Inc.
[17] Avouris, N., Tselios, N., Fidas, C., & Papachristos, E. (2003). “Website evaluation: A usability-based perspective”. In Advances in Informatics (pp. 217-231). Springer.
[18] Webmaster (2020). https//www.kibu.ac.ke
[19] Mahlke, S., & Thuering, M. (2007). “Studying antecedent of emotional experiences in interactive contexts”. CHI 2007 Proceedings Emotion & Empathy. USA.
[20] Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
[21] Hassenzahl, M. (2003). “Product, The Thing , and I: Understanding the Relationship , Between User and Product”. In C. O. M. Blythe, Funology: From usability to enjoyment (pp. 31–42)). Netherlands
[22] Aranyi, G., & Schaik, P. V. (2015). “Modeling, user experience with news websites”. Journal of the Association for Information , Science and Technology
[23] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View”. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
[24] Owoche Patrick, Mbugua Samuel, Ikoha Anselemo., (2019). “Using Twitter for Branding : Hotel, Strategies in International Journal of, Advanced , Research in Computer and ,Communication Engineering 263-273.
[25] Owoche Patrick, Mbugua Samuel, Ikoha Anselemo., (2019) “Hotel Branding using Facebook and, Dialogic Principles of Internet Communication”., International Journal of Advanced Research in, Computer Engineering & Technology), 38-36