International Journal of Computer
Trends and Technology

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF

Volume 4 | Issue 8 | Year 2013 | Article Id. IJCTT-V4I8P142 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V4I8P142

Applying Technology Acceptance (TAM) model to determine the acceptance of Nursing Information System (NIS) for Computer Generated Nursing Care Plan among nurses

Babu Dharmarajan, Dr.Kasthuri Gangadharan

Citation :

Babu Dharmarajan, Dr.Kasthuri Gangadharan, "Applying Technology Acceptance (TAM) model to determine the acceptance of Nursing Information System (NIS) for Computer Generated Nursing Care Plan among nurses," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2625-2629, 2013. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V4I8P142

Abstract

An advance in the development of information technology and the performance standards in the healthcare systems require an electronic health care record to allow the management of the various sources of clinical data in a patient-centered care approach for the health organization which has been well known in nursing, where patient centered holistic care is central to the majority of nursing models through the nursing process. Methods: An explorative study has been carried out to determine the level of acceptance of Nursing Information System (NIS) for computer generated nursing care plan among thirty nurses selected by convenience sampling technique in the selected hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, in the pre implementation stage. Self administered Likert’s scale questionnaire based on.

Keywords

Spam, Detection of Spams, ICA++, PCA, Neural Network.

References

1. Ball J Marion, Hannah J Kathryn. Health Informatics Series (Computers in Health Care). Second Edition. Springer-Verlag.Newyork.1998
2. Mohanty Rajesh, Rana Sarosh D, Kolay Saroj K. Hospital Information System in Medicare-An experience at TATA main hospital, Jamshedpur
3. Nancy Staggers, Cheryl Bagley Thompson, Rita Snyder-Halpern. History and Trends in Clinical 
4. Information Systems I the United States. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2001:33(1), 75-81
5. Bichel Findlay J, Callen J, Sara A. An Information System’s contribution to work satisfaction: Differing perspectives between Doctors and Nurses. HIC 2008 Australia’s Health Informatics Conference.
6. Boone Keith, Whittenburg LuAnn, Saba K. Virginia. Coded Nursing Documentation (CND) Profile Proposal. Patient Care Cooriantion (PCC) IHE Technical Committee. 2008.
7. McCormick A Kathleen, Saba K Virginia. Essentials of Nursing Informatics. Fourth Edition. McGrawHill, Newyork.2006
8. Marjorie Cengiz, Jane Ranzenberger, Dicky S Johnson, Ann K Killpack, Robert W Lumpkins, and Allan Pryor T. Design and Implementation of computerized nursing care plans. IEEE.1983. 561564. 
9. Tsirintani M, Mantas J. A prototype design of Cardiological Computerized Nursing Care Plans for an Electronic Patient Care Record. In:Health and Medical Informatics Education in Europe, IOS Press, 2000:107-112
10. Chambers M. User Acceptance of multimedia software application to increase preparedness for caring problems. ISHMIR Proceedings, the sixth international symposium on Health Information Management Research, May 2001: 39-47. 
11. Lee, Tin-Ting. Nurses Perception of their documentation experiences in a Computerized Nursing Care Plan System. Journal of Clinical Nursing. Vol 15: 2006; 1376-82.
12. Anton Pearce. Creating Nursing Care Plans. Healthcare Systems.
13. Ronald, Iller Carola, Mansmann Ulrich, Eichstadter, Ammenwerth Elske. Factors affecting and affected by User Acceptance of computer based nursing documentation: Results of a Two year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Vol 10:No(1) Jan/Fen:2003. Pp:69-70. 
14. Dillon Andrew, Morris G. Michael. The Influence of User Perceptions on software Utilization: Application and Evaluation of Theoretical Model of Technology Acceptance. IEEE Software (1997);14:4, 58-6.
15. Galletta F.Dennis, Malhotra Yogesh. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to account for social influence:Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.1999.
16. Santosa Insap Paulus. Student’s attitude toward webcast Lecture: An online survey result.
17. Davis, Fred D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. Sep 1989; 13(3); ABI/INFORM Global pg. 319.
18. Stocker, Gary. Technology acceptance of electronic medical records by nurses. Doctoral dissertation – research. Webster University, 2010; D.Mgt. (84 p)
19. Lu CH, Hsiao JL, Chen RF. Factors determining nurse acceptance of hospital information systems. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN [Comput Inform Nurs] 2012 May; Vol. 30 (5), pp. 257-64.
20. Kowitlawakul Y. The technology acceptance model: predicting nurses' intention to use telemedicine technology (eICU). Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN [Comput Inform Nurs] 2011 Jul; Vol. 29 (7), pp. 411-8.
21. Tao D. Understanding intention to use electronic information resources: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Annual Symposium Proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium [AMIA Annu Symp Proc] 2008 Nov 06, pp. 717-21.
22. Chow M, Chan L, Lo B, Chu WP, Chan T, Lai YM. Exploring the intention to use a clinical imaging portal for enhancing healthcare education. Nurse Education Today [Nurse Educ Today] 2012 Feb 13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Feb 13.
23. De Veer AJ, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. International Journal Of Nursing Studies [Int J Nurs Stud] 2010 Jul; Vol. 47 (7), pp. 846-54.
24. Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Bauersachs A, Eitner S, Budach A Knipfer C, Stelzle F. Acceptance of virtual dental implant planning software in an undergraduate curriculum: a pilot study. BMC Medical Education [BMC Med Educ] 2012 Sep 29; Vol. 12, pp. 90.