Statistical Analysis of Factors that Influences the Evaluation and Adoption of Multi-Tenant Databases

International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT)          
© 2016 by IJCTT Journal
Volume-37 Number-2
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : Olumuyiwa Matthew, Kevan Buckley, Mary Garvey
DOI :  10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V37P117


Olumuyiwa Matthew, Kevan Buckley, Mary Garvey "Statistical Analysis of Factors that Influences the Evaluation and Adoption of Multi-Tenant Databases". International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) V37(2):85-95, July 2016. ISSN:2231-2803. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.

Abstract -
Multi-tenant Databases (MTD) are implemented in the deployment of database management services to Information Technology (IT) platform users. A database service provider hosts the Multi-tenant Database Management System (MTDMS) and each tenant subscribes to the service through a standard method such as a web service. Improved groupings of the factors that influence the adoption of MTDs are presented in this paper. A survey is presented here that involves forty one experts from the field of databases. A predictive analytical method called Relative Importance Index (RII) and other statistical tools have been adopted in the analysis. The result has led to the new framework in the adoption of MTDs. The research also considers the direction of decisions about MTDs in situations where two or more factors are combined. A new improved MTD framework is presented that improves the decision making process of MTD adoption.

[1] Chaturvedi, A. and Bhat, Z.A.(2015) Adaptive Resource Scaling Methods for Multi-tenant cloud system.International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) [online] 30(2) pp93-97
[2] Matthew, O., Garvey, M., Buckley, K (2016) A Framework for Multi-Tenant Database Adoption Based On the Influencing Factors. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science8(3), pp.1-9.
[3] Ni, J., Li, G., Zhang, J., Li, L. and Feng, J. (2012) Adapt: adaptive database schema design for multi-tenant applications Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. [online]. Maui, Hawaii, USA New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp.2199-2203.
[4] Ying, H., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., and Wang, N. (2011) DB2MMT: A Massive Multi-tenant Database Platform for Cloud Computing e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), 2011 IEEE 8th International Conference on. [online]. pp.335-340
[5] PengchengXiong, Yun Chi, Shenghuo Zhu, Hyun Jin Moon, Pu, C. and Hacgumus, H. (2015) SmartSLA: Cost-Sensitive Management of Virtualized Resources for CPU-Bound Database Services. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on [online], 26(5), pp. 1441-1451 .
[6] Sang, C., Li, Q. and Kong, L. (2012) Tenant Oriented Lock Concurrency Control in the Shared Storage Multi-tenant Database Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2012 IEEE 16th International. [online]. pp.179-189.
[7] Jacobs, D. and Aulbach, S. (2007) Ruminations on multitenant databases. BTW Proceedings [online], 103pp. 514-521.
[8] Grund, M., Schapranow, M., Krueger, J., Schaffner, J. and Bog, A. (2008) Shared Table Access Pattern Analysis for Multi- Tenant Applications Advanced Management of Information for Globalized Enterprises, 2008. AMIGE 2008.IEEE Symposium on. [online]. pp.1-5.
[9] Schiller, O., Schiller, B., Brodt, A. and Mitschang, B. (2011) Native support of multi-tenancy in RDBMS for software as a service Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. [online]. Uppsala, Sweden New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp.117-128.
[10] Wood, K. and Anderson, M. (2011) Understanding the Complexity Surrounding Multitenancy in Cloud Computing e- Business Engineering (ICEBE), 2011 IEEE 8th International Conference on. [online]. pp.119-124.
[11] Fang, S. and Tong, Q. (2011) A comparison of multi-tenant data storage solutions for Software-as-a-Service Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), 2011 6th International Conference on. [online]. pp.95-98.
[12] Matthew, O., Dudley, C. and Moreton, R. (2014) A Review Of Multi-Tenant Database And Factors That Influence Its Adoption. UKAIS 2014 Conference [online].
[13] Keemti, P. (2010) Multi-tenant Database Architecture [online]. [Accessed 23 August 2013]. Available at < ttntda_topic1>
[14] Khan, M.F. and Ullah, M.A. (2012) An Approach Towards Customized Multi-Tenancy. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS) [online], 4(9), pp. 39.
[15] Yaish, H., Goyal, M. and Feuerlicht, G. (2013) Proxy service for multi-tenant database access. in Availability, Reliability, and Security in Information Systems and HCI. Springer, .
[16] Matthew, O., Buckley, K. and Garvey, M (2015) Predicting The Impact of The Factors That Influence The Adoption Of Multi-Tenant Databases. International Conference on Computer and Information Science and Technology (Cist`15); 05/2015 University of Ottawa, Canada
[17] Dodge, Y. (2006) The Oxford dictionary of statistical terms. [online] Oxford University Press.
[18] Tonidandel, S. and LeBreton, J. (2011) Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology [online], 26(1), pp. 1-9.
[19] Holt, G. (2013) Asking questions, analysing answers: relative importance revisited. Construction Innovation [online], 14(1), pp. 2-16.
[20] Sambasivan, M. and Soon, Y.W. (2007) Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management [online], 25(5), pp. 517-526 Available at:< 06001700>.
[21] Gündüz, M., Nielsen, Y. and Özdemir, M. (2012) Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey. Journal of Management in Engineering [online], 29(2), pp. 133-139
[22] Hinton, P.R., McMurray, I. and Brownlow, C. (2014) SPSS explained. [online] Routledge.
[23] Miller, R. and Acton, C. (2009) SPSS for social scientists. [online] Palgrave Macmillan.

Multi-tenant Database, Multi-tenant Database Management System, Predictive Analytical Method, Relative Importance Index, Framework.