Citation :

Meenakshi Devi, Rakesh Kumar, "Participation-Aware Search-Based Joint Client Selection and Adaptive Aggregation for Federated Learning," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 47-62, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I8P106

Abstract

Federated learning is affected by differences in client data, behavior, and resource requirements. This paper develops and evaluates a search-based, client-participation-aware strategy for federated client selection and adaptive aggregation. It uses a genetic-search procedure with a multi-criteria objective. To avoid unstable aggregation, the searched weights are combined with the data-size weights. The experiment is performed on the non-IID MNIST dataset using a lightweight CNN. The proposed method is compared with standard federated learning baselines: Federated Averaging (FedAvg) and Federated Proximal (FedProx). The comparison also includes selection strategies such as loss-based and resource-aware selection. The method achieves the best final predictive performance, with an accuracy of 0.31, a macro-F1 of 0.22, and a loss of 2.14. However, it is limited by the final client disparity gap. Its selection entropy and stability variance also do not outperform all baselines. The proposed multi-criteria search improves predictive performance. Furthermore, ablation analysis shows performance deterioration when the participation component is removed. Similar degradation occurs when the searched weight coefficient in the aggregation varies. The fitness-weight and aggregation-ratio sensitivity analysis reports their influence on both predictive and participation behavior. However, the statistical analysis found that the search-based method is not significantly more predictive than the baselines. The results highlight the usefulness of participation-aware search for improving prediction-oriented federated training under non-IID data. Further, it is suggested that client-level balance requires more explicit disparity-aware design.

Keywords

Federated Learning, Deep Learning, Genetic Search, non-IID Data, Privacy Preservation, Participation-Aware Learning.

References

[1] Brendan McMahan et al., “Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data,” Proceedings of the 20^th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, vol. 54, pp. 1273-51282, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Peter Kairouz, and H. Brendan McMahan, “Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning,” Foundations and trends in machine learning, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 1-210, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Tian Li et al., “Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks,” Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Hangyu Zhu et al., “Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Survey,” Neurocomputing, vol. 465, pp. 371-390, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Takayuki Nishio, and Ryo Yonetani, “Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edge,” ICC 2019 – 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Shanghai, China, pp. 1-7, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Jian Li, Tongbao Chen, and Shaohua Teng, “A Comprehensive Survey on Client Selection Strategies in Federated Learning,” Computer Networks, vol. 251, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Shanika Iroshi Nanayakkara, Shiva Raj Pokhrel, and Gang Li, “Understanding Global Aggregation and Optimization of Federated Learning,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 159, pp. 114-133, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Dongseok Kang, and Chang Wook Ahn, “GA Approach to Optimize Training Client Set in Federated Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 85489-85500, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Bingyan Liu et al., “Recent Advances on Federated Learning: A Systematic Survey,” Neurocomputing, vol. 597, pp. 1-16, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] Yashothara Shanmugarasa et al., “A Systematic Review of Federated Learning from Clients’ Perspective: Challenges and Solutions,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, S2, pp. 1773-1827, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Madan Baduwal, Priyanka Paudel, and Vini Chaudhary, “Federated Learning: A Survey of Core Challenges, Current Methods, and Opportunities,” Computers, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1-52, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Jianqing Zhang et al., “FedALA: Adaptive Local Aggregation for Personalized Federated Learning,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 11237-11244, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Qiying Pan et al., “Contextual Client Selection for Efficient Federated Learning over Edge Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6538-6548, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Shinan Song et al., “Data Quality-Aware Client Selection in Heterogeneous Federated Learning,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1-17, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Tuong Minh Nguyen et al., “FedDSS: A Data-Similarity Approach for Client Selection in Horizontal Federated Learning,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 192, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Allan M. de Souza et al., “Adaptive Client Selection with Personalization for Communication Efficient Federated Learning,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 157, pp. 1-16, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Aissa Hadj Mohamed et al., “CCSF: Clustered Client Selection Framework for Federated Learning in Non-IID Data,” Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 16^th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC ’23), pp. 1-8, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Yulan Gao, Yansong Zhao, and Han Yu, “Multi-Tier Client Selection for Mobile Federated Learning Networks,” 2023 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp. 666-671, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Konglin Zhu et al., “Client Selection for Federated Learning using Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit under Long-Term Energy Constraint,” Computer Networks, vol. 250, pp. 1-24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Filipe Maciel et al., “Federated Learning Energy Saving through Client Selection,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 103, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] Rana Albelaihi, “Mobility Prediction and Resource-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learning in IoT,” Future Internet, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1-19, 2025.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] Jian Tang et al., “Joint Class-Balanced Client Selection and Bandwidth Allocation for Cost-Efficient Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Computing Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 5681-5698, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Liwei Wang et al., “Communication-Efficient Model Aggregation with Layer Divergence Feedback in Federated Learning,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2293-2297, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[24] Pian Qi et al., “Model Aggregation Techniques in Federated Learning: A Comprehensive Survey,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 150, pp. 272-293, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[25] Mohammad Moshawrab et al., “Reviewing Federated Learning Aggregation Algorithms; Strategies, Contributions, Limitations and Future Perspectives,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1-35, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[26] Ahmad Khalil et al., “Label-Aware Aggregation for Improved Federated Learning,” 2023 Eighth International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC), Tartu, Estonia, pp. 216-223, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[27] Haotian Wu, Jiaming Pei, and Jinhai Li, “FedCW: Client Selection with Adaptive Weight in Heterogeneous Federated Learning,” Computers, Materials and Continua, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[28] Ying-Chi Mao et al., “Federated Dynamic Client Selection for Fairness Guarantee in Heterogeneous Edge Computing,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 139-158, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[29] Yuxin Shi et al., “Fairness-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learning,” 2023 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 324-329, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[30] Tao Wan et al., “A Secure and Fair Client Selection based on DDPG for Federated Learning,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[31] Lina Su et al., “Fair Client Selection for Multi-Task Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 63, no. 6, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[32] Liangyan Li et al., “SCKM: Symmetric Co-Skew Moment for User Selection in Federated Learning,” Entropy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1-19, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[33] Narisu Cha, and Long Chang, “Multi-Objective Distributed Client Selection in Federated Learning-Assisted Internet of Vehicles,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 1-21, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[34] Shamim Ahmed et al., “Federated Learning Model with Dynamic Scoring-Based Client Selection for Diabetes Diagnosis,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 320, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[35] Elahe Eslami et al., “The GAO-based Federated Learning Framework with Adaptive Client Selection for Resource-efficient Edge-IoT Systems,” Cluster Computing, vol. 29, no. 11, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[36] Y. LeCun et al., “Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278-2324, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]