International Journal of Computer
Trends and Technology

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 7 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCTT-V74I7P102 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I7P102

Federated Sovereign AI Ecosystems: A Framework for Trusted Governance and Cross-Border Intelligence Interoperability


Abdinasir Ismael Hashi, Abdirizak Mohamed Hashi, Osman Abdullahi Jama

Received Revised Accepted Published
25 May 2026 29 Jun 2026 14 Jul 2026 30 Jul 2026

Citation :

Abdinasir Ismael Hashi, Abdirizak Mohamed Hashi, Osman Abdullahi Jama, "Federated Sovereign AI Ecosystems: A Framework for Trusted Governance and Cross-Border Intelligence Interoperability," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 7-22, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I7P102

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cybersecurity and cross-border intelligence sharing has increased in relevance and importance in recent years; however, current Centralised AI architectures are plagued with data privacy, Digital sovereignty, Governance and regulatory compliance concerns. This study introduces a Federated Sovereign AI Ecosystem (FSAIE) designed to foster the sharing of intelligence within a federated learning framework, securely integrate data interoperability, and ensure national data sovereignty and trusted Governance. Testing of the framework was conducted on the UNSW-NB15 cybersecurity dataset that consists of 257,673 network traffic records with 49 features, and the World Governance Indicators (WGI) dataset. Four models (Random Forest, XGBoost, Deep Neural Network (DNN), Federated Learning) were built and evaluated for accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, trust index, interoperability and communication cost. The experimental results show that the XGBoost model has the highest “accuracy (99.05%), precision (99.50%), recall (99.01%), F1 score (99.25%) and ROC-AUC (0.9995%)” than the Random Forest model (accuracy: 98.08%) and DNN model (accuracy: 97.18%). The proposed ecosystem also showed an impressive Trust Index of 94.56 and achieved a 100% efficiency in intelligence exchange and a communication cost of 21,096.22 KB per round, which establishes a secure and efficient cross-border collaboration. The proposed FSAIE is a scalable, privacy-first, and governance-enlightened solution closely balancing predictive performance with trusted interoperability and national data sovereignty to make collaborative AI-driven cybersecurity applications a reality.

Keywords

Federated Sovereign AI; Federated Learning; Trusted Governance; Cross-Border Intelligence Interoperability; Data Sovereignty; Cybersecurity.

References

[1] Swarna Bindu Chetty et al., “Sovereign AI for 6G: Towards the Future of AI-Native Networks,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-8, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Adebayo Nurudeen Kalejaiye, “Federated Learning in Cybersecurity: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Models for Threat Intelligence Across Geopolitically Sensitive Organizational Boundaries,” International Journal of Advance Research Publication and Review, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 227-250, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[3] Taiwo Justice Olorunlana, “Securing the Global Cloud: Addressing Data Sovereignty, Cross-Border Compliance, and Emerging Threats in a Decentralized World,” International Journal of Science, Architecture, Technology, and Environment, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1394-1407, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Venkata Satya Sai Ajay Daliparthi et al., “Digital Sovereignty for Collaborative AI Engineering: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 216438-216465, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Waseem Nasir, and P. Kumar, “Integrating Policy, Technology, and Intelligence in Federated Cybersecurity Frameworks,” 2025.
[
Google Scholar]

[6] Yu Chen, “AI Sovereignty: Navigating the Future of International AI Governance,” pp. 1-28, 2024.
[
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Chaudhary Hamza Riaz, and Muhammad Usman Hadi, “Cross-Border Intelligence: Defending AI Innovation in the Age of Digital Sovereignty and GDPR,” SSRN, pp. 1-16, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Obehi Irekponor, “Designing Resilient AI Architectures for Predictive Energy Finance Systems Amid Data Sovereignty, Adversarial Threats, and Policy Volatility,” International Journal Advance of Research Publication and Reviews, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 73-100, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[9] Mayowa Emmanuel, “AI-Driven Energy Finance Systems Aligned with Cross-Border Data Sovereignty Laws,” 2025.
[
Google Scholar]

[10] Laxman Singh et al., “Adaptive Hybrid Intelligence Framework for Proactive Cross-Border Fraud Detection in Electronic Transaction Ecosystems,” Journal of Scientific Innovation and Advanced Research, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1-10, 2025.
[
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Yik Chan Chin et al., “Interoperability in AI Safety Governance: Ethics, Regulations, and Standards,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-122, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Md Tarek Hasan, and Sai Praveen Kudapa, “Data Privacy-Aware Machine Learning and Federated Learning: A Framework for Data Security,” American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-34, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Clara Maathuis, and Kasper Cools, “Digital Sovereignty Control Framework for Military AI-based Cyber Security,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-10, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Boyang Dong, and Zhengyi Zhang, “AI-Driven Framework for Compliance Risk Assessment in Cross-Border Payments: Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges and Response Strategies,” Spectrum of Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-24, 2024.
[
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Prem Pradeep Motgi, “Federated Infrastructure Blueprints for Sovereign AI: Cross Border Workload Orchestration and Data Localization,” International Journal of Engineering Technology Research and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 97-109, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Segun Odion, and Santosh Reddy Addula, “AI Risk Governance for Advancing Digital Sovereignty in Data-Driven Systems: An Integrated Multi-Layer Framework,” Future Internet, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1-30, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Shalabh Kumar Singh, and Shubhashis Sengupta, “Sovereign AI: Rethinking Autonomy in the Age of Global Interdependence,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-11, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Avinash Agarwal, and Manisha J. Nene, “A Federated Architecture for Sector-Led AI Governance: Lessons from India,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, pp. 1-14, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Sreenivasulu Gajula, “Federated Intelligence in Financial Ecosystems: A Privacy-Preserving AI Framework for Cross-border Risk Analysis,” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 60s, pp. 1040-1048, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Daniel Foster, “Machine Learning-Based Privacy Preservation and Data Governance in Cross-Border Data Sharing,” 2026.
[
Google Scholar]

[21] Alejandro López et al., “Adaptive Collaborative Intelligence Models for Real-Time Threat Analysis under Cross-Border Cyber Incidents and Governmental Emergency Protocols,”.
[
Google Scholar]

[22] Jiling Lin, “Design and Simulation of a Federated Learning-based Multilateral Data Privacy Protection and Ethical Collaborative Governance Model for Cross-Border E-Commerce,” Proceedings of the 2025 5th International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States, pp. 324-330, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Meena P. Subramanian, “The Influence of Federated AI on Data Sovereignty in Global Enterprises,” International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Trends, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. pp. 1-6, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[24] Kaggle, UNSW-NB15, Kaggle. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mrwellsdavid/unsw-nb15

[25] World Bank Group, Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank Group, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators

[26] Fortune Ifeanyi, and Victor Eze, “IoT Threat Detection using Federated Learning and Edge AI with Random Forest Optimization,” Nature Journal of Emerging Sciences Technologies and Innovations, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 92-103, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[27] Jiaqi Zhao et al., “SXGB: Secure and Efficient Vertical Federated XGBoost via Trusted Execution Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 2275-2288, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[28] Marco Röder, Peter Kowalczyk, and Frédéric Thiesse, “Leveraging the Potentials of Federated AI Ecosystems,” Innovation Through Information Systems: Volume III: A Collection of Latest Research on Management Issues, vol. 48, pp. 61-68, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[29] Tymoteusz Miller et al., “Federated Learning for Environmental Monitoring: A Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 1-24, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[30] Adil Akhmetov, Batyr Sharimbayev, and Mohammed Alaa Ala'anzy, “Personalized Federated Learning for Sovereign Personal AI Agents: A Review,” 2026 18th International Conference on Electronics, Computer, and Computation (ICECCO), Kaskelen, Kazakhstan, pp. 1-6, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]