Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 4 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCTT-V74I4P103 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I4P103Bayesian and Stochastic Modeling Approaches to Coronary Artery Disease Progression: A Systematic Review of Methods, Applications, and Clinical Implications
Sainabou Ngack
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Feb 2026 | 30 Mar 2026 | 17 Apr 2026 | 30 Apr 2026 |
Citation :
Sainabou Ngack, "Bayesian and Stochastic Modeling Approaches to Coronary Artery Disease Progression: A Systematic Review of Methods, Applications, and Clinical Implications," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 29-44, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I4P103
Abstract
Bayesian and stochastic models in coronary artery disease extend beyond prediction to clinical implications, including adaptive trial designs, personalized medicine, and enhanced risk stratification. Using a systematic review of literature approach, this study examines Bayesian and stochastic modeling approaches to coronary artery disease progression. The study selects literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework, which led to the selection of 17 articles from five databases using some specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results show that Bayesian modeling approaches were more prevalent in the predictive landscape of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), especially when it concerns risk estimation and prognostic modeling. Findings show that while Bayesian techniques focus on probabilistic inference and statistical learning, stochastic techniques prioritize time evolution, physical simulation, and biological plausibility. Results show that Bayesian models perform in individualized risk prediction and calibration, whereas stochastic approaches have strength in providing a deeper understanding of disease dynamics and longitudinal progression patterns. Findings show that Bayesian applications are more patient-specific, while stochastic models support longitudinal and cohort-level management. Results show that Bayesian models are more mature for deployment in predictive clinical environments, while stochastic models provide insight into disease evolution and mechanistic underpinnings. The study establishes that there is a difference between the predictive strength of Bayesian models and the mechanistic interoperability of stochastic models, highlighting the need for integrative modeling frameworks.
Keywords
Bayesian models, Cardiovascular disease, Coronary Artery Disease(CAD), Stochastic models, Applications.
References
[1] Abdullah A. Abdullah,
Masoud M. Hassan, and Yaseen T. Mustafa, “A Review on Bayesian Deep Learning in
Healthcare: Applications and Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp.
36538-36562, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Ismail Olatunji Adeyemi, Muhammed Lawal Akanbi, and Abdulwahab
Olanrewaju Issa, “Influence of Game Literacy on Gamified Library Services:
A Systematic Review of Literature,” Alexandria: The Journal of National and
International Library and Information Issues, 2025.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Safial Islam Ayon, Milon
Islam, and Rahat Hossain, “Coronary Artery Heart Disease Prediction: A
Comparative Study of Computational Intelligence Techniques,” IETE Journal of
Research, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 2488-2507, 2022.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Hadis Barati
et al., “Bayesian
Age-period-cohort Projection of Cancers in Iran: A Modeling Study,” BMC
Cancer, vol. 24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Abdul Zahir Baratpur et
al., “Coronary Artery Disease Prediction using Bayesian-optimized Support
Vector Machine with Feature Selection,” Frontiers in Network Physiology,
vol. 5, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Dimitris
Bertsimas, Agni Orfanoudaki, and Rory B. Weiner, “Personalized Treatment for Coronary
Artery Disease Patients: A Machine Learning Approach,” Health Care
Management Science, vol. 23, pp. 482-506, 2020.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Arindam Brahma et al.,
“Development of a Cohort Analytics Tool for Monitoring Progression Patterns in
Cardiovascular Diseases: Advanced Stochastic Modeling Approach,” JMIR
Medical Informatics, vol. 12, p. e59392, 2024.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Zhebin Du et
al., “Trends and Projections of Kidney
Cancer Incidence at the Global and National Levels, 1990–2030: A Bayesian
Age-Period-Cohort Modeling Study,” Biomarker Research, vol. 8, 2020.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Parya Esmaeili et al.,
“Unraveling Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Through
Conditional Probability Analysis with Bayesian Networks: Insights from the AZAR
Cohort Study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 2024.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Martin
Glanzer, and Georg Ch. Pflug, “Multiscale Stochastic Optimization: Modeling Aspects and
Scenario Generation,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol.
75, pp. 1-34, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Nathalia Gonzalez-Jaramillo
et al., “Systematic Review of Physical Activity Trajectories and Mortality in
Patients with Coronary Artery Disease,” Journal of the American College of
Cardiology, vol. 79, no. 17, pp. 1690-1700, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] V. Dankan Gowda et al., “Predictive
Performance and Clinical Implications of Machine Learning in Early Coronary
Heart Disease Detection,” 2024 2nd World Conference on
Communication & Computing (WCONF), RAIPUR, India, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Alind Gupta et
al., “Probabilistic
Graphical Modeling for Estimating Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Applications
of a Flexible Machine-learning Method,” Medical Decision Making, vol.
39, no. 8, pp. 1032-1044, 2019.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Aji L. Ismaila et al.,
“Bayesian-optimized Ensemble Support Vector Machine Model for Phishing Email
Detection,” FUDMA Journal of Sciences, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 837-842,
2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Jie Jian et al., “The
Identification and Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation in Coronary Artery Disease
Patients: A Multicentre Retrospective Study based on Bayesian Network,” Annals
of Medicine, vol. 56, no. 1, 2024.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Danli Kong et
al., “Bayesian
Network Analysis of Factors Influencing Type 2 Diabetes, Coronary Heart
Disease, and Their Comorbidities,” BMC Public Health, vol. 24, 2024.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Milos Kopa,
and Tomas Rusý, “A Decision-dependent Randomness Stochastic Program for Asset–liability
Management Model with a Pricing Decision,” Annals of Operations Research,
vol. 299, pp. 241-271, 2021.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Jiaying Li et
al., “Global,
Regional and National Trends in the Burden of Low Bone Mineral Density from
1990 to 2030: A Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort Modeling Study,” Bone, vol.
189, p. 117253.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Tariq Mahmood et al.,
“Enhancing Coronary Artery Disease Prognosis: A Novel Dual-class Boosted
Decision Trees Strategy for Robust Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 12,
pp. 107119-107143, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Kunihiro
Matsushita et al., “Epidemiology and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Populations with
Chronic Kidney Disease,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 18, pp.
696-707, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholars] [Publisher Link]
[21] Oishee Mazumder et al.,
“Synthetic PPG Signal Generation to Improve Coronary Artery Disease
Classification: Study with Physical Model of Cardiovascular System,” IEEE
Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp.
2136-2146, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] L.J. Muhammad et al.,
“Machine Learning Predictive Models for Coronary Artery Disease,” SN
Computer Science, vol. 2, 2021.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Mahmoud Ragab et al.,
“Leveraging Fuzzy Embedded Wavelet Neural Network with Multi-criteria
Decision-making Approach for Coronary Artery Disease Prediction using
Biomedical Data,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 2024.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Udaya Ralapanawa, and
Ramiah Sivakanesan, “Epidemiology and The Magnitude of Coronary Artery Disease
and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review,” Journal of Epidemiology
and Global Health, vol. 11, pp. 169-177, 2021.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Fabrizio Ruggeri et al.,
“Is There a Future for Stochastic Modeling in Business and Industry in the Era
of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence?,” Applied Stochastic Models
in Business and Industry, vol. 41, no. 2, 2025.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Marc Schut et al., “Innovation Portfolio Management for the
Public Non-profit Research and Development Sector: What can we Learn from the
Private Sector?,” Innovation and Development, vol. 15, no. 3, pp.
689-707, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Chunli Shao et al.,
“Coronary Artery Disease: From Mechanism to Clinical Practice,” Coronary
Artery Disease: Therapeutics and Drug Discovery, pp. 1-36, 2020.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Xiaowen Suo et al.,
“Development and Validation of a Bayesian Network‐based Model for Predicting
Coronary Heart Disease Risk from Electronic Health Records,” Journal of the
American Heart Association, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Mark Steyvers
et al., “Bayesian
Modeling of Human–AI Complementarity,” Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 11, p. e2111547119, 2022.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Hristos Tyralis, and
Georgia Papacharalampous, “A Review of Predictive Uncertainty Estimation with
Machine Learning,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, 2024.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Kalia Orphanou, Athena
Stassopoulou, and Elpida Keravnou, “DBN-extended: A Dynamic Bayesian Network
Model Extended with Temporal Abstractions for Coronary Heart Disease
Prognosis,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 20,
no. 3, pp. 944-952, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Rens Van de
Schoot et al., “Bayesian Statistics and Modelling,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers,
vol. 1, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Jeremy Warren et al.,
“Bridging Hemodynamics, Tissue Mechanics, and Pathophysiology in Coronary
Artery Disease: A New Agent-based Model with Tetrahedral Mesh Integration,” Journal
of Biomechanics, vol. 183, p. 112631, 2025.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] World Health Organization
(2025), Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
[35] Minglang Yin, Alireza
Yazdani, and George Em Karniadakis, “One-dimensional Modeling of Fractional
flow Reserve in Coronary Artery Disease: Uncertainty Quantification and
Bayesian Optimization,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and
Engineering, vol. 353, pp. 66-85, 2019.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Meiwen Yuan et al., “Trend in Cervical Cancer
Incidence and Mortality Rates in China, 2006–2030: A Bayesian Age-period-cohort
Modeling Study,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol.
32, no. 6, pp. 825-833, 2023.
[CrossRef]
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]