International Journal of Computer
Trends and Technology

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 4 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCTT-V74I4P103 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I4P103

Bayesian and Stochastic Modeling Approaches to Coronary Artery Disease Progression: A Systematic Review of Methods, Applications, and Clinical Implications


Sainabou Ngack

Received Revised Accepted Published
27 Feb 2026 30 Mar 2026 17 Apr 2026 30 Apr 2026

Citation :

Sainabou Ngack, "Bayesian and Stochastic Modeling Approaches to Coronary Artery Disease Progression: A Systematic Review of Methods, Applications, and Clinical Implications," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 29-44, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I4P103

Abstract

Bayesian and stochastic models in coronary artery disease extend beyond prediction to clinical implications, including adaptive trial designs, personalized medicine, and enhanced risk stratification. Using a systematic review of literature approach, this study examines Bayesian and stochastic modeling approaches to coronary artery disease progression. The study selects literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework, which led to the selection of 17 articles from five databases using some specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results show that Bayesian modeling approaches were more prevalent in the predictive landscape of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), especially when it concerns risk estimation and prognostic modeling. Findings show that while Bayesian techniques focus on probabilistic inference and statistical learning, stochastic techniques prioritize time evolution, physical simulation, and biological plausibility. Results show that Bayesian models perform in individualized risk prediction and calibration, whereas stochastic approaches have strength in providing a deeper understanding of disease dynamics and longitudinal progression patterns. Findings show that Bayesian applications are more patient-specific, while stochastic models support longitudinal and cohort-level management. Results show that Bayesian models are more mature for deployment in predictive clinical environments, while stochastic models provide insight into disease evolution and mechanistic underpinnings. The study establishes that there is a difference between the predictive strength of Bayesian models and the mechanistic interoperability of stochastic models, highlighting the need for integrative modeling frameworks.

Keywords

Bayesian models, Cardiovascular disease, Coronary Artery Disease(CAD), Stochastic models, Applications.

References

[1] Abdullah A. Abdullah, Masoud M. Hassan, and Yaseen T. Mustafa, “A Review on Bayesian Deep Learning in Healthcare: Applications and Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 36538-36562, 2022.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Ismail Olatunji Adeyemi, Muhammed Lawal Akanbi, and Abdulwahab Olanrewaju Issa, “Influence of Game Literacy on Gamified Library Services: A Systematic Review of Literature,” Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, 2025.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Safial Islam Ayon, Milon Islam, and Rahat Hossain, “Coronary Artery Heart Disease Prediction: A Comparative Study of Computational Intelligence Techniques,” IETE Journal of Research, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 2488-2507, 2022.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Hadis Barati et al., “Bayesian Age-period-cohort Projection of Cancers in Iran: A Modeling Study,” BMC Cancer, vol. 24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Abdul Zahir Baratpur et al., “Coronary Artery Disease Prediction using Bayesian-optimized Support Vector Machine with Feature Selection,” Frontiers in Network Physiology, vol. 5, 2025.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Dimitris Bertsimas, Agni Orfanoudaki, and Rory B. Weiner, “Personalized Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Machine Learning Approach,” Health Care Management Science, vol. 23, pp. 482-506, 2020.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Arindam Brahma et al., “Development of a Cohort Analytics Tool for Monitoring Progression Patterns in Cardiovascular Diseases: Advanced Stochastic Modeling Approach,” JMIR Medical Informatics, vol. 12, p. e59392, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Zhebin Du et al., “Trends and Projections of Kidney Cancer Incidence at the Global and National Levels, 1990–2030: A Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort Modeling Study,” Biomarker Research, vol. 8, 2020.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Parya Esmaeili et al., “Unraveling Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Through Conditional Probability Analysis with Bayesian Networks: Insights from the AZAR Cohort Study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] Martin Glanzer, and Georg Ch. Pflug, “Multiscale Stochastic Optimization: Modeling Aspects and Scenario Generation,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 75, pp. 1-34, 2020.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Nathalia Gonzalez-Jaramillo et al., “Systematic Review of Physical Activity Trajectories and Mortality in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 79, no. 17, pp. 1690-1700, 2022.
[
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] V. Dankan Gowda et al., “Predictive Performance and Clinical Implications of Machine Learning in Early Coronary Heart Disease Detection,” 2024 2nd World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF), RAIPUR, India, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Alind Gupta et al., “Probabilistic Graphical Modeling for Estimating Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Applications of a Flexible Machine-learning Method,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1032-1044, 2019.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Aji L. Ismaila et al., “Bayesian-optimized Ensemble Support Vector Machine Model for Phishing Email Detection,” FUDMA Journal of Sciences, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 837-842, 2025.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Jie Jian et al., “The Identification and Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Multicentre Retrospective Study based on Bayesian Network,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 56, no. 1, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Danli Kong et al., “Bayesian Network Analysis of Factors Influencing Type 2 Diabetes, Coronary Heart Disease, and Their Comorbidities,” BMC Public Health, vol. 24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Milos Kopa, and Tomas Rusý, “A Decision-dependent Randomness Stochastic Program for Asset–liability Management Model with a Pricing Decision,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 299, pp. 241-271, 2021.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Jiaying Li et al., “Global, Regional and National Trends in the Burden of Low Bone Mineral Density from 1990 to 2030: A Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort Modeling Study,” Bone, vol. 189, p. 117253.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Tariq Mahmood et al., “Enhancing Coronary Artery Disease Prognosis: A Novel Dual-class Boosted Decision Trees Strategy for Robust Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 107119-107143, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Kunihiro Matsushita et al., “Epidemiology and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Populations with Chronic Kidney Disease,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 18, pp. 696-707, 2022.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholars] [Publisher Link]

[21] Oishee Mazumder et al., “Synthetic PPG Signal Generation to Improve Coronary Artery Disease Classification: Study with Physical Model of Cardiovascular System,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2136-2146, 2022.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] L.J. Muhammad et al., “Machine Learning Predictive Models for Coronary Artery Disease,” SN Computer Science, vol. 2, 2021.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Mahmoud Ragab et al., “Leveraging Fuzzy Embedded Wavelet Neural Network with Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach for Coronary Artery Disease Prediction using Biomedical Data,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[24] Udaya Ralapanawa, and Ramiah Sivakanesan, “Epidemiology and The Magnitude of Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review,” Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, vol. 11, pp. 169-177, 2021.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[25] Fabrizio Ruggeri et al., “Is There a Future for Stochastic Modeling in Business and Industry in the Era of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence?,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, vol. 41, no. 2, 2025.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[26] Marc Schut et al., “Innovation Portfolio Management for the Public Non-profit Research and Development Sector: What can we Learn from the Private Sector?,” Innovation and Development, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 689-707, 2025.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[27] Chunli Shao et al., “Coronary Artery Disease: From Mechanism to Clinical Practice,” Coronary Artery Disease: Therapeutics and Drug Discovery, pp. 1-36, 2020.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[28] Xiaowen Suo et al., “Development and Validation of a Bayesian Network‐based Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk from Electronic Health Records,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[29] Mark Steyvers et al., “Bayesian Modeling of Human–AI Complementarity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 11, p. e2111547119, 2022.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[30] Hristos Tyralis, and Georgia Papacharalampous, “A Review of Predictive Uncertainty Estimation with Machine Learning,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, 2024.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[31] Kalia Orphanou, Athena Stassopoulou, and Elpida Keravnou, “DBN-extended: A Dynamic Bayesian Network Model Extended with Temporal Abstractions for Coronary Heart Disease Prognosis,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 944-952, 2016.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[32] Rens Van de Schoot et al., “Bayesian Statistics and Modelling,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 1, 2021.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[33] Jeremy Warren et al., “Bridging Hemodynamics, Tissue Mechanics, and Pathophysiology in Coronary Artery Disease: A New Agent-based Model with Tetrahedral Mesh Integration,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 183, p. 112631, 2025.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[34] World Health Organization (2025), Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

[35] Minglang Yin, Alireza Yazdani, and George Em Karniadakis, “One-dimensional Modeling of Fractional flow Reserve in Coronary Artery Disease: Uncertainty Quantification and Bayesian Optimization,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 353, pp. 66-85, 2019.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[36] Meiwen Yuan et al., “Trend in Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates in China, 2006–2030: A Bayesian Age-period-cohort Modeling Study,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 825-833, 2023.
[CrossRef] [
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]