Usability Evaluation of Kenyan Universities Websites for Webometrics Ranking

  IJCTT-book-cover
 
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT)          
 
© 2022 by IJCTT Journal
Volume-70 Issue-2
Year of Publication : 2022
Authors : Adeline Mukanda, Samuel M buguah, Franklin Wabwoba
  10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V70I2P101

MLA

MLA Style: 
Adeline Mukanda, et al. "Usability Evaluation of Kenyan Universities Websites for Webometrics Ranking" International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol. 70, no. 2, Feb. 2022, pp.1-9.    Crossref , https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V70I2P101.

APA Style:
Adeline Mukanda, Samuel M buguah, Franklin Wabwoba (2022). Usability Evaluation of Kenyan Universities Websites for Webometrics Ranking. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 70(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V70I2P101

Abstract
      The study aimed to evaluate the usability of Kenyan universities websites for webometrics ranking using web analysis tools. The target population for the study was the top five (5) universities in the January 2020 edition of webometrics ranking in Kenya. The study collected, analyzed, and evaluated website usability of the following website attributes: URL structure, Website Age, Uptime, Content Management System, website hosting service provider, Responsiveness, Browser compatibility, Color contrast, Domain Authority, Domain Backlinks, Website traffic, Broken Links, Number of Subdomains, Website Speed, Indexed webpages, Website compression, Search Engine Optimization, Website content utility, Website design and Website Accessibility. After analysis, it was noted that Kenyan universities need to improve on some of the usability criteria used in the study where a score of less than 50% was attained, such as Website compression, website speeds, website subdomain, website indexed pages, website traffic, website backlinks, website colour contrast and website design.

Keywords
Website evaluation, usability criteria, web analysis tools, Kenyan Universities.

Reference

[1] Rust V. D, and Kim S, The Global Competition in Higher Education. World Studies in Education, 13 (2012) 5-20.
[2] Cybermetrics., New edition: January 2020. Retrieved from Ranking Web of Universities(2020). [Online]. Available: http://webometrics.info/en/current_edition.
[3] Cybermetrics, Decalogue of good practices in institutional web positioning. Retrieved from Ranking Web of Universities(2022). [Online]. Available: https://webometrics.info/en/Best_Practices.
[4] Mukanda A, Mbuguah S, Wabwoba F, and Ikoha A, Modelling User Experience with Universities Websites Based on Webometrics Ranking User Analysis, International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), 68(4) (2020) 165-174.
[5] Shackel B, Usability - Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interacting with Computers, 21(5-6) (2009) 339–346.
[6] Zaphiris P, and Darin E. R, Website Usability and Content Accessibility of the top USA Universities. Proceedings of the WebNet 2001 World Conference on the WWW and Internet. (2001) 1380-1385.
[7] Sindhuja N. P, & Surajit G. D, Impact of the Factors Influencing Website Usability on User Satisfaction, The IUP Journal of Management Research, 8(12) (2009) 54-66.
[8] ISO. ISO DIS 9241-210:2010 Ergonomics of human-system interaction -Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems(formerly known as 13407). Switzerland: International Standardization Organization (ISO) (2010). [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standards.html
[9] Booth P. A., An Introduction to Human-computer Interaction. Psychology Press. (1989).
[10] Shackel B, Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Human factors for informatics usability. (1991) 21–37.
[11] Nielson J, Usability engineering. Cambridge: MA: Academic Press. (1993).
[12] McLaughlin J, and Skinner D, Developing Usability and Utility: A Comparative Study of the Users of New IT. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(3) (2010) 413-423.
[13] Larusdottir M, Listen to YOur Users -- The Effect of Usability Evaluation on Software Development Practice. Uppsala Sweden: Uppsala University. (2009).
[14] Stone D, Jarrett C, Woodroffe M, and Minocha S, User Interface Design and Evaluation. (2005).
[15] Matera M, Rizzo F, and Carughi G. T, Web Usability: Principles and Evaluation Methods. In Web Engineering. (2006) 143-180.
[16] Hasan L, Usability evaluation framework for e-commerce websites in developing countries. Loughborough University. (2009).
[17] Contel T, Jobson M, E. M, and Guilherme H, Usability Evaluation Based on Web Design Perspectives. First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. (2010).
[18] Kostaras N, and Xenos M, Assessing Educational Website Usability using heuristic Evaluation Rules. In Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics, Patras, Greece. (2007) 543–550.
[19] Astan M, and Elhindi M. A., An empirical study of university websites. Issues in Information Systems, 9(2) (2008) 460–465.
[20] Wang d, and Huang W, Lund UniversityWebsite Evaluation: Focus on Homepage and English research Pages. Master’s Thesis: Lund University. (2009).
[21] Alotaibi M. B, Assessing the usability of university websites in Saudi Arabia: A heuristic evaluation approach. 2013 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations Las Vegas, NV, USA. (2013) 138–142.
[22] Chamba-Eras L, Jácome-Galarza L.-R, Guaman-Quinche R, Coronel-Romero E, and Labanda-Jaramillo M, Analysis of usability of universities Web portals using the Prometheus tool - SIRIUS. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on e-Democracy e-Government (ICEDEG). (2017) 195-199.
[23] Deedam F. B, Thomas E.-a, and Taylor O. E, Accessibility and Usability Evaluation of State-Owned Universities Website in Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 56(1) (2018) 31-36.
[24] Jabar M. A, Usman A. U, and Awal A, Assessing The Usability Of University Websites From Users’ Perspective. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science. 7(10) (2013) 98-111.