Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 2 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJCTT-V74I2P104 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I2P104Agentic AI Systems: Architecture, Data Infrastructure, and Context Management
Hitesh Chugani
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Dec 2025 | 17 Jan 2026 | 09 Feb 2026 | 26 Feb 2026 |
Citation :
Hitesh Chugani, "Agentic AI Systems: Architecture, Data Infrastructure, and Context Management," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 16-29, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V74I2P104
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence has moved from reactive systems to systems that can reason, plan, and act over time. This shift has led to the development of Agentic Artificial Intelligence (Agentic AI). Unlike traditional AI systems that follow fixed input output rules, agentic AI systems maintain internal state, reason over context, plan multi-step actions, and interact with external environments with limited human input. This review places agentic AI within the historical development of agent-based artificial intelligence. It describes the main components of agentic systems, including perception, memory, goal management, execution, reflection, and orchestration. It also explains the data infrastructure required to support these systems. Traditional enterprise data platforms and stateless API-based integrations are not designed to support long-term reasoning, continuous context use, or dynamic tool interaction, which limits their suitability for agentic AI. A central focus of the paper is the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which provides a stateful interoperability layer that connects agents with external tools and data sources. MCP is compared with BDI architectures, classical multi-agent systems, and REST-based integration to explain its role and limitations. Security, implementation, and governance issues are also discussed. The review identifies research gaps in coordination, benchmarking, data integration, and secure deployment. Overall, the paper shows that agentic AI builds on earlier agent-based concepts using neural methods and requires layered architectures that combine reasoning models with interoperability standards.
Keywords
Agentic AI, Model Context Protocol (MCP), Autonomous AI Agents, Interoperability, Autonomous Agents.
References
[1] Dheer Toprani, and Vijay K. Madisetti, “LLM
Agentic Workflow for Automated Vulnerability Detection and Remediation in
Infrastructure-as-Code,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 69175–69181, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Ilias Chatzistefanidis, Andrea Leone, and
Navid Nikaein, “Maestro: LLM-Driven Collaborative Automation of Intent-Based 6G
Networks,” IEEE Networking Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 227–231, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Nalan
Karunanayake, “Next-generation Agentic AI for Transforming Healthcare,” Informatics
and Health, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 73–83, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Joon Yul
Choi, and Tae Keun Yoo, “Transforming Clinical Medicine with Multimodal
Artificial Intelligence, Agentic Systems, and the Model-context Protocol : A
Perspective on Future Directions,” Discover Health Systems, vol. 5,
2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Mohamad
Abou Ali, Fadi Dornaika, and Jinan Charafeddine, “Agentic AI: A Comprehensive
Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Future Directions,” Artificial
Intelligence Review, vol. 59, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] IBM, What
is agentic AI?. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/agentic-ai
[7] Vallikranth
Ayyagari, “Model Context Protocol for Agentic AI : Enabling Contextual
Interoperability Across Systems,” International Journal of Computational and
Experimental Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[8] Micaela
Kaplan, How Model Context Protocol Connects LLMs to the Real World, Label
Studio. [Online]. Available: https://labelstud.io/blog/how-model-context-protocol-connects-llms-to-the-real-world/
[9] Manas
Deepak Patil, and Virag Vijay Lokhande, “Model Context Protocol MCP Enabling
Scalable Ai Data Integration,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary
Research, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Aske Plaat
et al., “Agentic Large Language Models, A Survey,” Journal of Artificial
Intelligence Research, vol. 84, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Johannes
Schneider, “Generative to Agentic AI: Survey, Conceptualization, and
Challenges,” arXiv:2504.18875, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Deepak
Bhaskar Acharya, Karthigeyan Kuppan, and B. Divya, “Agentic AI: Autonomous
Intelligence for Complex Goals—A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Access,
vol. 13, pp. 18912–18936, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Mourad
Gridach et al., “Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress,
Challenges, and Future Directions,” arXiv:2503.08979, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Ranjan
Sapkota, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, and Manoj Karkee, “AI Agents vs. Agentic
AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges,” Information Fusion,
vol. 126, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Soodeh
Hosseini, and Hossein Seilani, “The Role of Agentic AI in Shaping a Smart
Future: A Systematic Review,” Array, vol. 26, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Baoyu
Liang, Yuchen Wang, and Chao Tong, “AI Reasoning in Deep Learning Era: From
Symbolic AI to Neural–Symbolic AI,” Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 11, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[17] T. Nithya
et al., “A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning: Advancements,
Applications, and Challenges,” 2023 Second International Conference on
Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS), 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Thomas
Rincy N, and Roopam Gupta, “A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches and Its
Techniques,” 2020 IEEE International Students’ Conference on
Electrical,Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS), 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] William
Grant Hatcher, and Wei Yu, “A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications
and Emerging Research Trends,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 24411–24432,
2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Md
Zahangir Alom et al., “A State-of-the-Art Survey on Deep Learning Theory and
Architectures,” Electronics, vol. 8, no. 3, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Sandeep
Singh Sengar et al., “Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
and Applications,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 84, pp.
23661–23700, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Tam
Sakirin, and Siddartha Kusuma, “A Survey of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Techniques,” Babylonian Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Francesco
Piccialli et al., “AgentAI: A Comprehensive Survey on Autonomous Agents in
Distributed AI for Industry 4.0,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol.
291, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Andreas
Brännström et al., “A Formal Framework for Designing Boundedly Rational
Agents,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on
Agents and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Prashant
Gupta, Rational Agents for Artificial Intelligence, Medium, 2017. [Online].
Available: https://medium.com/hackernoon/rational-agents-for-artificial-intelligence-caf94af2cec5
[26] Laurent
Frering, Gerald Steinbauer-Wagner, and Andreas Holzinger, “Integrating
Belief-Desire-Intention Agents with Large Language Models for Reliable Human–robot
Interaction and Explainable Artificial Intelligence,” Engineering
Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 141, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Geylani
Kardas, Baris Tekin Tezel, and Moharram Challenger, “Domain-specific Modelling
Language for Belief–Desire–Intention Software Agents,” IET Software,
2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Diego
Aineto, Sergio Jiménez, and Eva “Learning STRIPS Action Models with Classical
Planning,” arXiv:1903.01153, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[29] Xenija
Neufeld, Sanaz Mostaghim, and Sandy Brand, “A Hybrid Approach to Planning and
Execution in Dynamic Environments Through Hierarchical Task Networks and
Behavior Trees,” Fourteenth Artificial Intelligence and Interative Digital
Entertainment Conference, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 201–207, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Sofia
Kouah et al., “Internet of Things-Based Multi-Agent System for the Control of
Smart Street Lighting,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 18, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[31] Jiaxin
Liang et al., “A Review of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Algorithms,” Electronics,
vol. 14, no. 4, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Shuo Yang
et al., “Reinforcement Learning Agents Playing Ticket to Ride–A Complex
Imperfect Information Board Game With Delayed Rewards,” IEEE Access,
vol. 11, pp. 60737–60757, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Ajay Bandi
et al., “The Rise of Agentic AI : A Review of Definitions, Frameworks,
Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges,” Future
Internet, vol. 17, no. 9, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Markets
and Markets, AI Agents Market Size, Share, Growth and Lates Trends, 2025.
[Online]. Available: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ai-agents-market-15761548.html
[35] AI Agents
Market (2026 - 2033), Grand View Research. [Online]. Available: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ai-agents-market-report
[36] Venus
Garg, “Designing the Mind: How Agentic Frameworks Are Shaping the Future of AI
Behavior,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, vol. 7,
no. 5, pp. 182–193, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Mohammed
Salah et al., “Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration:
Foundations, Applications, and Governance Mohammed Salah,” SSRN, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Yi Yu et
al., “Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory
Management for Large Language Model Agents,” arXiv: 2601.01885, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Gokcer
Belgusen, Memory Types in Agentic AI: A Breakdown, Medium, 2025. [Online].
Available: https://medium.com/@gokcerbelgusen/memory-types-in-agentic-ai-a-breakdown-523c980921ec
[40] Mohan
Varthakavi, Reimagining Data Architecture for Agentic AI, DataVarsity, 2025.
[Online]. Available: https://www.dataversity.net/articles/reimagining-data-architecture-for-agentic-ai/#:~:text=would%20likely%20miss.-
[41] Manish Sood, “Agentic AI is Forcing a Shift from Application-first to Data-first Architecture, RELTIO, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.reltio.com/resources/blog/agentic-ai-is-forcing-a-shift-from-application-first-to-data-first-architecture/#:~:text=It
[42] Xinyi Hou
et al., “Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future
Research Directions,” ACM Transactions of Software Engineering and
Methodology, 2026.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]
[43] Anna
Gutowska, What is Model Context Protocol (MCP)?, IBM. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/model-context-protocol
[44] Padmanabhan
Venkiteela, “The New Interoperability Paradigm : Model Context Protocol ( MCP
), APIs, and the Future of Agentic AI,” Computer Fraud and Security,
vol. 2025, no. 1, pp. 1259–1271, 2025.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Aniket P.
Kakde et al., “Advancing Agentic AI through Communication Protocols,” International
Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 5,
pp. 299–308, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Manoj
Kumar Rath, “Adaptive Model Context Protocols for Trustworthy and Secure
Agentic AI Systems,” International Journal of Computer Technology and
Electronics Communication, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 11444–11456, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Codiste,
Model Context Protocol (MCP) vs Traditional APIs: Key Differences and Use
Cases, Medium. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/@nishantbj/model-context-protocol-mcp-vs-traditional-apis-key-differences-and-use-cases-24dc023f16f2
[48] Herman Errico,
Jiquan Ngiam, and Shanita Sojan, “Securing the Model Context Protocol (MCP):
Risks, Controls, and Governance,” arXiv: 2511.20920, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Sonu Kumar
et al., “MCP Guardian: A Security-First Layer for Safeguarding MCP-Based AI,” Computer
Science and Information Technology, pp. 107–121, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[50] Grigoris
Ntousakis et al., “Securing MCP-Based Agent Workflows,” Proceedings of the 4th
Workshop on Practical Adoption Challenges of ML for Systems, pp. 50-55,
2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher
Link]