Survey and Analysis on Wetland Detection Technique through Satellite Imagery

  IJCTT-book-cover
 
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT)          
 
© 2016 by IJCTT Journal
Volume-40 Number-1
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : Arun Kumar Tiwari, Dr. Nishchol Mishra
  10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V40P109

MLA

Arun Kumar Tiwari, Dr. Nishchol Mishra "Survey and Analysis on Wetland Detection Technique through Satellite Imagery". International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) V40(1):49-54, October 2016. ISSN:2231-2803. www.ijcttjournal.org. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.

Abstract -
Wetlands are most important and valuable ecosystem for maintaining biodiversity on the planet. In present scenario wetlands are vulnerable to climate change and land conversion activities like agriculture and urbanization. Due to their important fine temporal scale monitoring of sensitive wetlands are required. For this purpose few tools are specified to monitor the wetland at landscape scale. To understand better wetland detection technique a detailed survey on different wetland detection methodology using satellite imagery is performed. Its aim to identify the best techniques to detect wetland changes in present scenario so that appropriate changes on studied techniques according to needs in different wetland areas analysis can be suggested.

References
1. M. Halabisky, L. M. Moskal, A. Gillespie, M. Hannam “Reconstructing semi-arid wetland surface water dynamics through spectral mixture analysis of a time series of Landsat satellite images (1984–2011)” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 177, pp. 171–183, 2016.
2. C. Baker, R. L. Lawrence, C. Montagne, and D. Patten” Change detection of wetland ecosystems using Landset imagery and change vector analysis”Wetlands, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 610–619, September 2007
3. C. Baker, R. L. Lawrence, C. Montagne, and D. Patten “Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM+ imagery and decision -tree-based models ”Wetlands, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 465–474, June 2006
4. S. O. Kotchi, S. Brazeau, P. Turgeon, Y. Pelcat, J. Légaré, M.P. Lavigne, F. N. Essono, R. A. Fournier, and P. Michel” Evaluation of Earth Observation Systems for Estimating Environmental Determinants of Microbial Contamination in Recreational Waters” in Proc. IEEE Int. Geosci.Remote Sens, VOL. 8, NO. 7, JULY 2015
5. J. N. Serran, I. F. Creed,” New mapping techniques to estimate the preferential loss of small wetlands on prairie landscapes” Hydrol. Process. 30, pp. 396–409 ,2016 [online] (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10582
6. G. Ovakoglou, T. K. Alexandridis,∗, T. L. Crismanb, C. Skoulikaris, G. S. Vergos,” Use of MODIS satellite images for detailed lake morphometry: Application to basins with large water level fluctuations” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geo. vol. 51 pp. 37–46, 2016
7. B. Pradhan, M. S. Tehrany, M. N. Jebur,” A New Semiautomated Detection Mapping of Flood Extent From TerraSAR-X Satellite Image Using Rule-Based Classification and Taguchi Optimization Techniques” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 54, no. 7, july 2016
8. L. C CHEN” Detection of shoreline changes for tideland areas using multi-temporal satellite images”, International Journal of Remote Sens.,vol. 19 no.17,pp 3383-3397,1998, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311698214055
9. K. C. Fickas . W. B. Cohen .Z. Yang” Landsat-based monitoring of annual wetland change in the Willamette Valley of Oregon, USA from 1972 to 2012” Wetlands Ecol Manage vol. 24 pp 73–92,2016 [online] DOI 10.1007/s11273-015-9452-0
10. Environmental Laboratory, Corps of engineers wetlands delineation manual, technical report Y-87-1. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 1987.
11. J.B. Adams, &, A.G. Gillespie. “Spectral-mixture analysis. Remote Sensing of Landscapes With Spectral Mages; A Physical Modeling Approach”. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–165, 2006
12. J.B. Adams, M.O. Smith, & P.E. Johnson,” Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site”. Journal of Geophysical Research -Solid Earth, 91(B8), pp. 8098– 8112. 1986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB08p08098
13. P. Shanmugam, Y. -H. Ahn, & S. Sanjeevi, “A comparison of the classification of wetland characteristics by linear spectral mixture modelling and traditional hard classifiers on multispectral remotely sensed imagery in southern India.” Ecological Modelling,vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 379–394, 2006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.033.
14. R. L. Lawrence, and A. Wright.”Rule-based classification systems using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing vol. 67,pp.1137– 1142, 2001
15. R. Lawrence, A. Bunn, S. Powell, and M. Zambon. “Classification of remotely sensed imagery using stochastic gradient boosting as a refinement of classification tree analysis.” Remote Sens. Of Environment vol. 90 pp.331–336, 2004.
16. W. N. Venables, and B. D. Ripley.” Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS”, second edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA. 1997.
17. A. W. Parmenter, A. Hansen, R. Kennedy, W. Cohen, U. Langner, R. Lawrence, B. Maxwell, A. Gallant, and R. Aspinall. “Land use and land cover change in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: 1975–1995”. Ecological Applications Vol. 13, pp.687–703, 2003.
18. J. Sun, J. Yang, C. Zhang, W. Yun, and J. Qu, “Automatic remotely sensed image classification in a grid environment based on the maximum likelihood method,” Math. Comput. Modell., vol. 58, pp. 573– 581, 2013.
19. (2010) Change Vector Analysis (CVA). [Online] Available: http://web.pdx.edu/~nauna/weel5.pdf

Keywords
wetlands, spectral mixing analysis, change vector analysis, classification analysis tree, digital depth model.